Oxford University Comparative Law Forum

"The review about pl"

Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Archived thread - Read only 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Home Conferences M Chen-Wishart, In Defence of Unjust Factors (Protected)
Original message

chentybymmeme Click to EMail chentybymmemeClick to check IP address of the poster 07-Dec-10, 08:36 PM (GMT)
"The review about pl"
As a man, who played a lot in the real casinos, I will mention that the positive moment of the given online-casino is that probabilities of falling out in roulette are maximally close to real ones.

The confirmation to that are two hits of the ball to "zero" for 10 minutes of the game.

Playing roulette in Grand Casino, the online-casino I every time win $15-30 in half an hour of a careful game. I think that such a situation is a sign of an honest game of the on-line-casino.

To be fair, it is needed to say about minuses in the work of the resource from the point of view of an ordinary user.

Firstly, it is automatic crediting of bonuses, without warning the player.

Personally I consider it as disrespect to players and imposing unprofitable terms of winning back the bonus.

Secondly, it is automatic writing off of the prize payments if the player refuses the receipt of bonuses in his profile. When the won facilities were not shown out in time personally I supposed that I «got» to win back bonuses.
When disconnecting an option to charge bonuses in the profile I simply wanted not to get bonuses in the next games.

However here they wrote off all the money which I won after the hidden and unasked charge of a bonus.

In general, all above mentioned is a imperfection in the work of the site, which can embarrass players, counting on a permanent game on small stakes.

Further, Grand Casino does not have intelligible statistics of input-output of money from the player’s deposit.

For a long time I could not grasp how much I won and output for a playing day. The incomprehensible history of input-output of money simply makes me angry.

It would be better to do three columns - date/time, input (the sum) and output (the sum).
The same disorder and mess in the column «History of games» – the time of stakes is incorrect, the history - incomplete.

In general, any manoeuvres are created to put a player in an unprofitable position which he cannot change in the hand mode, are not the things don’t add points.
Statistics plays guarantees winning of the casino as well, why to make the clients’ position worse with tricks such as imposing bonuses and writing off money from the account?
Such a strategy is acceptable to unpresentable offices which count on a large rapid income from an unscrupulous game and does not imply a long-term presence in the market.
Readm more story in my <a href=http://urupoker.com/>;Online Casino Blog</a>

  Top


Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Powered by DCF2000 ©1997-2000 by DCScripts. All rights reserved.